©Deirdre Nansen McCloskey | COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL


deirdremccloskey Deirdre Nansen McCloskey
Distinguished Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication
University of Illinois at Chicago

Professor of Economic History, Gothenburg University, Sweden

Deirdre McCloskey is an economist, historian, and rhetorician who has written sixteen books and around 400 scholarly pieces on topics ranging from technical economics and statistics to transgender advocacy and ethics. She is known as a "conservative" economist, University-of-Chicago style (she taught for 12 years there), but protests that "I'm a literary, quantitative, postmodern, free-market, progressive Episcopalian, Midwestern woman from Boston who was once a man. Not 'conservative'! I'm a Christian libertarian." Her latest book, Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World, argues that an ideological change, rather than saving or exploitation, is what made us rich... more »


"We…adopt a defensive and negative attitude towards every new opinion concerning something on which we already have an opinion." —Schopenhauer

Contents and exordium to final volume of The Bourgeois Era

from Bourgeois Equality (2015)

In the manuscript of Bourgeois Equality, just submitted to University of Chicago Press, McCloskey writes: "I ask you to open your mind to rethinking our economics and our economic history."

"The cause of the bourgeois betterments…was an economic liberation and a sociological dignifying of, say, a wig-maker of Bolton, son of a tailor, messing about with spinning machines, who died in 1792 as Sir William Arkwright possessed of one of the largest bourgeois fortunes in England. The Industrial Revolution and especially the Great Enrichment came from liberating the commoners from compelled service to an hereditary elite, such as the noble lord, or compelled obedience to a state functionary, such as the economic planner. And it came from according honor to the formerly despised of Bolton—or of Ōsaka, or of Lake Wobegon—commoners exercising their liberty to relocate a factory or invent airbrakes."


"A tetralogy is an abomination."

VoiceAmerica Business, 8 August 2014.



McCloskey has recorded a podcast on her forthcoming book Bourgeois Equality—the last in her Bourgeois Era trilogy—with hosts Ron Baker and Ed Kless of the VeraSage Institute.


Equality vs. Lifting Up the Poor

Financial Times, 12 August 2014

Deirdre McCloskey has penned a new opinion piece for the Financial Times (also here).

"It matters ethically, of course, how the rich obtained their wealth… What does not matter ethically are the routine historical ups and downs of the Gini coefficient, a measure of inequality, or the excesses of the 1 per cent of the 1 per cent, of a sort one could have seen three centuries ago in Versailles. … There are ways to help the poor—let the Great Enrichment proceed, as it has in China and India—but charity or expropriation are not the ways."


A rival to Thomas Piketty?

BBC, 26 May 2014; The Spectator (London), 24 May.



Evan Davis, who interviewed Deirdre McCloskey for an episode of BBC Radio 4's "Analysis" program (listen), has written a column pitting McCloskey's views on capital and inequality against those of the economist Thomas Piketty, author of the acclaimed Capital in the Twenty-First Century.


"Liberty Matters" forum on The Bourgeois Era

Liberty Fund, July 2014.

The Online Library of Liberty is featuring new commentary on Deirdre McCloskey's books Bourgeois Virtues and Bourgeois Dignity, including a lead essay by Donald Boudreaux, responses from Joel Mokyr, John Nye, and McCloskey (.pdf), and further discussion.


On a guaranteed income

PBS NewsHour, 24 April 2014.

Paul Solman interviews Deirdre McCloskey—and Enno Schmidt, Charles Murray, Veronique de Rugy, David Graeber, Felix Oberholzer-Gee, Barbara Bergmann, and Megan McArdle—for PBS NewsHour (video) on the policy of a guaranteed basic income.


"Virtues Lost"

ABC Religion & Ethics, 18 December 2013.



In this essay McCloskey reviews the intellectual history of the seven principal virtues and emphasizes that they comprise a system.

"The system of the virtues developed for two millennia in the West had been widely abandoned by the end of the eighteenth century, with Machiavelli, then Bacon, then Hobbes, then Bernard Mandeville as isolated but scandalous precursors of Kant and Bentham, who then rigorously finished off the job. It was not dropped because it was found on careful consideration to be mistaken. It was merely set aside with a distracted casualness, perhaps as old-fashioned, or as unrealistic in an age with a new idea of the Real, or as associated with religious and political systems themselves suddenly objectionable."

"The Big Read" on wage growth

Financial Times, 18 September 2014.

McCloskey is among eight economists who offer "ideas to jump-start wage growth" in a Financial Times forum. She writes, in part:

"Let betterment proceed by stripping away the silliest of the regulations, many of them emanating from Brussels, and the rest from special interests, or plain monopoly. To suppose that restricting free exchange makes the poor or the median better off is magical thinking. Give up the minimum wage, the 'protection' of jobs, the over-regulation of banking and the support for monopolies from taxis to surgeons."


"They're a full-scale defense of what we usually call 'capitalism'."

Illinois Policy, 20 August 2014.



In this recent speech, McCloskey presents many of the arguments found in the three books of her now-completed "boxed set" on the Bourgeois Era.


On the Great Enrichment

Institute of Economic Affairs, July 2014.



McCloskey tells ieaTV about the magnitude of economic changes over the past two centuries and explores the causes of those changes.


"In actual, functioning, real enterprise, all these virtues have to be in play"

BBC, 24 June 2014.



Deirdre McCloskey speaks with Stephen Sackur of BBC's "HARDtalk" (video) about inequality, markets, and virtues.

"Every enterprise in a capitalist economy works through solidarity, love, sympathy, common courtesy… Any economy, socialist or capitalist or however you wish, is a mixture of the virtues of love, hope, and faith, on the one hand, and the virtue of prudence—which by itself is called greed, but when it's in tune with justice and courage and temperance and love, it works pretty well."


Are Markets Moral?

Centre for Civil Society, 4 January 2014.



At a conference in New Delhi exploring this question, Deirdre McCloskey presented a paper titled "The Great Enrichment Came and Comes from Ethics and Rhetoric" (download, .pdf).

"What changed in Europe, and then the world, was not the material conditions of society, or 'commercialization,' or a new security of property, but the rhetoric of trade and production and improvement—that is, the way influential people talked about earning a living, such as Defoe, Voltaire, Montesquieu, Hume, Turgot, Franklin, Smith, Paine, Wilkes, Condorcet, Pitt, Sieyes, Napoleon, Godwin, Humboldt, Wollstonecraft, Bastiat, Martineau, Mill, Manzoni, Macaulay, Peel, and Emerson."


Economic liberty and social honor

Institute for Humane Studies, April 2014.



McCloskey finds in these the causes of the great increase in material well-being over the past two centuries.


"Humanomics: Or, Why Neo-Classical, Neo-Marxist, and Neo-Institutionalist Views of History and the Economy Are Wrong"

University of Nebraska–Lincoln, 27 February 2014.



Deirdre McCloskey offered this talk as part of UNL's "Humanities on the Edge" series.


>> Find more stories on page two

You can get news and updates from Prudentia on Twitter.
Looking for a specific McCloskey article? See something amiss? E-mail Prudentia's editor.