You are reading ©Deirdre McCloskey's Bourgeois Dignity, version 7/9/2009. View table of contents. This document is print-ready.
Deirdre Nansen McCloskey | Bourgeois Dignity and Liberty, July 2009 version
COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL | Forthcoming, University of Chicago Press, autumn 2010


Part XII. Science, Bourgeois Dignity, and the Industrial Revolution

 Pages in this part: | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | 

Chapters 30-31 from:
Bourgeois Dignity and Liberty: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World

Abstract

What happened to make for the factor of 16 were new ideas, what Mokyr calls “Industrial Enlightenment.” But the Scientific Revolution did not suffice. Non-Europeans like the Chinese outstripped the West in science until quite late. Britain did not lead in science—yet clearly did in technology. Indeed, applied technology depended on science only a little even in 1900.


 Pages in this part: | 1 | | 2 | | 3 | 

You may reply to this post without registering. Comments may be edited for content and clarity.