February 1st, 2010
A portion of McCloskey’s (June ’09 draft version of) Bourgeois Dignity is chosen for discussion on the NEP-HIS (New Economic Papers in History) blog. See “Growth, Quality, Happiness, and the Poor.”
By
Journal staff in
McCloskey's Books |
No Comments »
February 9th, 2010
The “lovely bit of writing” refers to Deirdre’s recent “Prudence, you no longer rule my world,” Times Higher Education, 14 January 2010. View original entry of 8 February 2010 at Jim Aune’s site.
By
Journal staff in
Blog alerts, McCloskey's Books |
No Comments »
February 11th, 2010
So the bourgeoisie is always with us. Yet bourgeoisies have usually been precarious. Braudel again chronicled the reluctant triumph of business civilization: “as the years passed, the demands and pressures of everyday life [in Europe in early modern times] became more urgent. . . . So with a bad grace, it allowed change to force the gates. And the experience was not peculiar to the West.” Even during the momentous turn 1300-1776 in Europe there were de-bourgeoisfications. [continues; click title bar above]
By
Journal staff in
The Bourgeois Era, The Bourgeois Revaluation - Jan. 2010 |
No Comments »
February 14th, 2010
“Sujectis” on Parcere.com wrote: I had the distinct pleasure of taking a class from Professor McCloskey at the University of Iowa (Western Civilization, I believe), one of those 200+ student undergrad lecture affairs … [continues] View original post
By
Journal staff in
Blog alerts, McCloskey's Economics, Teaching |
2 Comments »
February 18th, 2010
“It’s one of the finest writing books I’ve ever read, a fitting companion to Strunk & White’s Elements of Style and a handful of other beautifully written, easily read, and thoroughly entertaining books about writing.” … [continues; click post title above]
By
Journal staff in
McCloskey's Books, Writing |
8 Comments »
February 21st, 2010
Dear Reader: This is a rough draft as of January 2010. The three asterisks *** or the bold or NNN (for a name) or DDDD (for a date) and the many pages at the end with “items [perhaps] to be inserted” indicate only some of the numerous things to be done. I welcome comments, at (more…)
By
Journal staff in
The Bourgeois Era, The Bourgeois Revaluation - Jan. 2010 |
No Comments »
February 27th, 2010
The excerpt above is from a post called “Oomph” on Catallaxy Files. It continues with an interpretation: She argues that in much empirical analysis that people confuse statistical significance with substantive significance. In a play on words, she describes this as being the standard error of empirical analysis. For readers who are not statistically literate (more…)
By
Journal staff in
Blog alerts |
No Comments »