Jump to a page in this archive (posts are chronological):

Bourgeois Dignity section chosen for discussion

February 1st, 2010

A portion of McCloskey’s (June ’09 draft version of) Bourgeois Dignity is chosen for discussion on the NEP-HIS (New Economic Papers in History) blog. See “Growth, Quality, Happiness, and the Poor.”

Jim Aune blogs about “A lovely bit of writing, as always, from our Aunt Deirdre.”

February 9th, 2010

The “lovely bit of writing” refers to Deirdre’s recent “Prudence, you no longer rule my world,” Times Higher Education, 14 January 2010. View original entry of 8 February 2010 at Jim Aune’s site.

Chapter 5 of The Bourgeois Revaluation:
Yet on the Whole the Bourgeoisies Have Been Precarious

February 11th, 2010

So the bourgeoisie is always with us. Yet bourgeoisies have usually been precarious. Braudel again chronicled the reluctant triumph of business civilization: “as the years passed, the demands and pressures of everyday life [in Europe in early modern times] became more urgent. . . . So with a bad grace, it allowed change to force the gates. And the experience was not peculiar to the West.” Even during the momentous turn 1300-1776 in Europe there were de-bourgeoisfications. [continues; click title bar above]

A former student recalls Professor McCloskey

February 14th, 2010

“Sujectis” on Parcere.com wrote: I had the distinct pleasure of taking a class from Professor McCloskey at the University of Iowa (Western Civilization, I believe), one of those 200+ student undergrad lecture affairs … [continues] View original post

“I just discovered Deirdre N. McCloskey’s Economical Writing, and I’ve been smiling ever since.”

February 18th, 2010

“It’s one of the finest writing books I’ve ever read, a fitting companion to Strunk & White’s Elements of Style and a handful of other beautifully written, easily read, and thoroughly entertaining books about writing.” … [continues; click post title above]

Chapter 6 of The Bourgeois Revaluation:
The Dutch Preached Bourgeois Virtue

February 21st, 2010

Dear Reader: This is a rough draft as of January 2010. The three asterisks *** or the bold or NNN (for a name) or DDDD (for a date) and the many pages at the end with “items [perhaps] to be inserted” indicate only some of the numerous things to be done. I welcome comments, at (more…)

“I am a big fan of Deirdre McCloskey. One of the things she’s always carrying on about is ‘How big is big?’ “

February 27th, 2010

The excerpt above is from a post called “Oomph” on Catallaxy Files. It continues with an interpretation: She argues that in much empirical analysis that people confuse statistical significance with substantive significance. In a play on words, she describes this as being the standard error of empirical analysis. For readers who are not statistically literate (more…)


Jump to a page in this archive (posts are chronological):