April 10th, 2007
Dear Reader: Thank you for putting up with this, some draft chapters from a book manuscript — to be published, Deo volente, by the University of Chicago Press, perhaps in 2009. Any form of comment you find convenient has my thanks. It would be useful for example if you gave me your copy of the (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
2 Comments »
April 11th, 2007
How One Might See the Coming of a Bourgeois Ideology An earlier book, The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Capitalism (2006), argued that a businessperson can be ethical without abandoning her business. The seven primary virtues of any human life — prudence, temperance, justice, courage, faith, hope, and love — can run a (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
6 Comments »
April 17th, 2007
We seem therefore to be studying ideology here, I repeat, the change from a supposedly anti-bourgeois ideology in England around 1600 to a supposedly pro-bourgeois ideology around 1848. A good first step would seem to be to get the word “ideology” under control. But it keeps leaping up and growling and changing its spots. There (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
8 Comments »
April 17th, 2007
Under the heading Part I. What Needs to be Explained: The Rhetoric of the Aristocratic and Bourgeois English Something happened to the standing of a bourgeois life in England between 1600 and 1848. With whom? How to prove? Where exactly? In what respects exactly? A sheer, material, Marxist “rise of the bourgeoisie” does not seem (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns |
5 Comments »
April 17th, 2007
One countable piece of evidence that bourgeois values were becoming dominate in England in the 17th and 18th centuries is the new, dominate role of counting in giving evidence. It is assuredly modern. The pre-modern attitude—which survives of course in many a non-quantitative modern—shows in a little business between Prince Hal and Sir John Falstaff. (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
5 Comments »
April 17th, 2007
…by 1848, or 1790, or 1710 Not the mechanical “class position determined ideas” of the “rise of the bourgeoisie” notion. Acknowledge its force, for what it’s worth. But rising in numbers or not, bourgeois values “rose.” The rhetoric change. Davidoff and Hall here. A chapter or two showing the B character even of aristocratic talk (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
1 Comment »
April 17th, 2007
Profit More in Request than Honor A chapter under the heading: Part II. How It Happened in Venice, Amsterdam, Glasgow, London, and Philadelphia What made such talk conceivable was the “rise” of the bourgeoisie in northwestern Europe. The rise was more than numbers: it was a rise in prestige. The rise happened, in the Netherlands (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
3 Comments »
April 17th, 2007
Bourgeois republics have usually been undermined by resurgent aristocracy or oligarchy: Dutch, Venetian stories, leaving Britain as unique by 1750. Britain was a freshly bourgeois society. But of course bourgeois life is ancient, and so the liberalism and other virtues that go along with it have traces earlier even than the Dutch Republic in its (more…)
By
Deirdre McCloskey in
Bourgeois Towns, The Bourgeois Era |
No Comments »