Jump to a page in this archive (posts are chronological):

Margaret on “Signifying Nothing”

April 30th, 2007

Dearest Deirdre, Not for publication, obviously – just the quickest means of communication as our email is down over the whole 5-day long weekend. I’ve just read your revised “Signifying Nothing”. Slowly(!), in order to understand as well as possible outside my own “world”. If I’m reading correctly, I think you might like to re-proof (more…)

Ziliak & McCloskey’s “The Cult of Statistical Significance” is the 2nd most downloaded article on the heavily-trafficked StatLit website

December 20th, 2010

— About The Cult of Statistical Significance — See summary paper, “The Cult of Statistical Significance” — StatLit website

A case before the Supreme Court on statistical significance (Jan. 10, 2011) involves Deirdre McCloskey

January 5th, 2011

Below is a reprint from Mark Thoma’s Economist‘s View: “Does Statistical Significance Stink?” by Steve Ziliak on 5 Jan. 2010. Does Statistical Significance Stink? Steve Ziliak emails: Dear Mark, When is anosmia – the permanent loss of smell – “significant”? [There is] a Supreme Court case – to be argued on January 10, 2011 – (more…)

From U. Michigan blog: “The Cult of Statistical Significance authors challenge cold medicine makers’ math in Supreme Court case”

January 9th, 2011

“In supposedly one of the top ten cases of the Supreme Court this year … ” (excerpted from and continues at University of Michigan Press Blog, 28 Dec. 2010.

Podcast of the oral argument before the Supreme Court on January 10th involving Deirdre McCloskey is available.

January 17th, 2011

Justice Kagan refers to the arguments in Ziliak and McCloskey “The Cult of Statistical Significance” (without naming them). Listen to the argument ».

On the US Supreme Court matter of Matrixx v. Siracusano et al.

April 21st, 2011

“Making a Stat Less Significant,” Carl Bialik, Wall Street Journal, 2 Apr. 2011 “A Statistical Test Gets Its Closeup, Wall Street Journal, 1 Apr. 2011 Supreme Court Decision delivered by Justice Sotomayor, 22 March 2011 “‘Statistical Significance’ and the US Supreme Court: Ziliak-McCloskey, Statistical Literacy News, 2011. “Now their [McCloskey and Ziliak's] view is the (more…)


Jump to a page in this archive (posts are chronological):